Matthieu Hanho Roberge
↓ Cliquez sur ce bouton pour ajouter une nouvelle entrée.
HCI After Technosolutionism
The text is interesting in several ways. First, the critique of making makes a lot of sense. As an interactive design student, I am directly concerned with this topic. By building our own technological tools, we feel more responsible for our consumption and gain a better understanding of the technologies we use. However, inequalities persist: access to components and education remains a privilege, even when we take a DIY approach.
Technosolutionism finds a very interesting echo in the 2004 lecture by André Comte-Sponville, a contemporary French philosopher, titled Is Capitalism Moral?. In this text, he describes four orders that govern society and should not be confused: the technico-scientific and economic order, the juridico-political order, the moral order, and the ethical order. The critique of technosolutionism is based precisely on a confusion between these orders. Technology belongs to the first order and should be limited to showing what is possible and what is not. It should not claim to solve societal problems, as these issues fall under the juridico-political or moral order.
( I used chat GPT to help me for the grammar and the translation from french to english)
Link with TouchDesigner, a visual code software were we use also nodes